Read the full judgment text of CACC 000245/1972 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant, in this case pleaded guilty to two summonses preferred against him, one of obstruction, contrary to section 4A(1) of the Summary Offences Ordinance, Cap. 228 and the other of hawking without a licence, contrary to the provisions of the Hawker By-laws made under the Public Health and Urban Services Ordinance, Cap. 132. In respect of the summons for obstruction he was fined the sum of $1,000.-. Not surprisingly, he exercised his right of applying for a review of that sentence. Th