Choi Siu-ming v. R.

Read the full judgment text of CACC 248/1993 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 October 1993.

2. At the outset of this hearing he abandoned his appeal against conviction, but applies for leave to appeal against sentence out of time. No application for such leave had been made until this morning. He advances no reasons for his application for leave to appeal out of time, save that he originally intended to appeal against his conviction but was unable to raise the money to brief counsel and says that he would now like to appeal against sentence.

Case No.CACC 248/1993
Court
Court of Appeal
Date26 Oct 1993
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000248/1993

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1993, No 248
(Criminal)

__________

THE QUEEN
AND
CHOI SIU-MING

___________

Coram: Hon. Sir T.L. Yang, C.J., Mortimer J.A. and Sears J.

Date of hearing: 26 October 1993

Date of judgment: 26 October 1993

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

Mortimer, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court) : This applicant originally appealed against his conviction for a number of offences including criminal damage, arson, blackmail and professing to be a member of a triad society. He received a total effective sentence of five years imprisonment.

2. At the outset of this hearing he abandoned his appeal against conviction, but applies for leave to appeal against sentence out of time. No application for such leave had been made until this morning. He advances no reasons for his application for leave to appeal out of time, save that he originally intended to appeal against his conviction but was unable to raise the money to brief counsel and says that he would now like to appeal against sentence.

3. If this Court is to give leave to appeal against sentence out of time there must be some good reason for the appeal not having been launched in time. No good reason is advanced and the application is therefore refused.

4. We add that the facts of the cases show that this was extremely serious organised criminal conduct, and for such conduct, even when prosecuted in the District Court, this was a lenient sentence.

(Sir T.L. Yang) (Barry Mortimer) (R.A.W. Sears)
Chief Justice Justice of Appeal judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr D.G. Saw (Crown Prosecutor) for Crown/Respondent

Applicant in person