Wah Yan Property Ltd. v. Ideaction Strategic Investment Ltd. and Another
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 24 September 1999.
1. This is the hearing of a Petition to wind-up the 1st Respondent company. The Petition has had a very long history. It was first started in 1997 with a different Petitioner being an associated company of the present Petitioner. By various orders made by the Companies Judge, there is now a Re-Re-Re-Amended Petition and there has now been substituted for the original Petitioner the present Petitioner, namely Wah Yan Property Limited, one of the two shareholders of the Company in question. The ot
|
HCCW000187A/1997 HCCW 187/97 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 187 OF 1997 ____________
____________ Coram: The Honourable Madam Justice Yuen in Court Date of Hearing: 24 September 1999 Date of Delivery of Judgment: 24 September 1999 ______________ J U D G M E N T ______________ 1. This is the hearing of a Petition to wind-up the 1st Respondent company. The Petition has had a very long history. It was first started in 1997 with a different Petitioner being an associated company of the present Petitioner. By various orders made by the Companies Judge, there is now a Re-Re-Re-Amended Petition and there has now been substituted for the original Petitioner the present Petitioner, namely Wah Yan Property Limited, one of the two shareholders of the Company in question. The other shareholder of the Company in question is the 2nd Respondent. 2. Before me today, the Petitioner has indicated that it would not be proceeding with the Re-Re-Re-Amended Petition on the second ground, namely that it would be just and equitable to wind-up the company, so the present Re-Re-Re-Amended Petition is concerned only with a debt of more than $20,000,000.00 owed by the Company to the Petitioner. This is now unopposed and it is clear that, therefore, a winding-up order ought to be made on the ground of insolvency of the Company. 3. The parties are agreed as to the costs order to be made, which is as follows:
Accordingly, I would make an order that the Company be wound-up under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance and I will make the costs order as indicated.
Representation: Mr. Anderson Chow, instructed by Messrs Francis Yim & Co., for the Petitioner Mr. Louis Chan, instructed by Messrs Cheng Yeung & Co., for the 1st and 2nd Respondents Miss A. Li from the Official Receiver's Office |