Read the full judgment text of CACC 000253/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 June 2003.
1. On 14 June 2001, the Applicants, (D1 to D5, D7 to D9 and D11 respectively), following a trial before Deputy Judge Candy sitting in the District Court, were convicted on a charge of conspiracy to defraud, contrary to Common Law and punishable under section 159C(6) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200 ("the first charge"). D1 was also convicted of a second charge alleging that he dealt with property known or reasonably believed to represent the proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to sectio
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 3 cases