Read the full judgment text of HCA 004273/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 September 2002.
1. In May 1999 the first defendant, (Mr. Yiu), entered into a two contracts with the plaintiff (the College) to provide teaching services, one contract for day school teaching, the other for evening school tutorial teaching. Under the contract Mr. Yiu was paid a base salary for day school teaching and a fee for evening school tutorial teaching that was based on a percentage of the gross fees received from the students who enrolled in classes he took. The day school contract was terminable on one
Cites 2 cases