HKSAR v. Man Wai Ming
Read the full judgment text of CACC 254/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 September 2000 before Mayo Ag. CJHC, Leong JA, Beeson J.
1. This application for a certificate to be issued pursuant to section 32 of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 is many months out of time. The explanation given by the applicant for the delay is not such as to justify us in granting leave to proceed out of time. A further factor which has been weighed by us is that the contemplated appeal is devoid of merit. The issues which the applicant seeks to persuade us to certify were the same issues which were considered by the Court of Appea
Legal issues: Leave to appeal out of time – section 32(2) CFAO
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal out of time refused.
Cited by 3 cases
|
CACC000254A/1998 CACC 254/1998 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 254 OF 1998 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC 430/1997) __________________
______________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo Ag. CJHC, Leong JA and Beeson J in Court Date of Hearing: 26 September 2000 Date of Decision: 26 September 2000 ______________ D E C I S I O N ______________ Hon Mayo Ag. CJHC (giving the decision of the Court): 1. This application for a certificate to be issued pursuant to section 32 of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 is many months out of time. The explanation given by the applicant for the delay is not such as to justify us in granting leave to proceed out of time. A further factor which has been weighed by us is that the contemplated appeal is devoid of merit. The issues which the applicant seeks to persuade us to certify were the same issues which were considered by the Court of Appeal on his appeal. As was stated then the directions given by the Judge were impeccable and no question of great or general importance arises. 2. This being the case the motion is denied.
Representation: Mr P S Chapman, SADPP of the Department of Justice, for the respondent Man Wai-ming, the applicant in person |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 254/1998