Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 001028/1973 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 22 September 1973.
1. Each of the first six Plaintiffs was employed by the Defendant under a "continuous contract" within the meaning of S.2A(1) of the Employment Ordinance, Cap. 57, and in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, the length of notice required for the Defendant to terminate those contracts was one month by virtue of the provisions of S.4(1) and S.5(2) of the Ordinance.