Read the full judgment text of DCEO 000001/2001 on BabelCite. This DCEO judgment.
1. All the Plaintiffs were former cabin attendants employed by the Defendant. It is the Plaintiffs' case that at the operative date of the Sex Discrimination Ordinance, Cap. 480 ("the Ordinance"), the Defendant had adopted a discriminatory practice, under which female cabin attendants employed prior to 1993 had to retire at the age of 40 with an option to extend to 45, whilst on the other hand, male cabin attendants could retire at the age of 55 with an option of early retirement at 45. All the
Cites 1 case