HKSAR v. Ngan Lung Café and Noodles Restaurant Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 18/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 April 2003.

1. I have carefully considered the submissions by Mr Choy Bing Wing, the authorised representative of the applicant and that by Mr Cheng, Government Counsel. I have also considered the cases quoted, especially R. v. Wicks [1997] 2 AER 801, Boddington v. British Transport Police [1998] 2 AER 203 and Palacegate Properties Limited v. Camden London Borough Council , 82 P&CR 199.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCMA 18/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Apr 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000018A/2003

HCMA18/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.18 OF 2003

(ON APPEAL FROM TWS 3543 OF 2002 AND TWS 6463-6466 OF 2002)

---------------------

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
NGAN LUNG CAFé AND NOODLES
RESTAURANT LIMITED
Applicant

---------------------

Coram : Hon Nguyen J in Court

Date of Hearing : 14 April 2003

Date of Handing Down Ruling : 17 April 2003

-------------------

R U L I N G

-------------------

1.I have carefully considered the submissions by Mr Choy Bing Wing, the authorised representative of the applicant and that by Mr Cheng, Government Counsel. I have also considered the cases quoted, especially R. v. Wicks [1997] 2 AER 801, Boddington v. British Transport Police [1998] 2 AER 203 and Palacegate Properties Limited v. Camden London Borough Council, 82 P&CR 199.

2.The three points which the applicant submits are points of law of great and general importance, worthy of consideration by the Court of Final Appeal are :

(1) whether the Wednesbury principles of reasonableness are relevant in determining whether an authority has acted unreasonably or ultra vires when the authority appears to have unlimited powers;

(2) whether section 104 of Cap.227 empowers a magistrate to review all his previous orders, including a ruling on a point of law;

(3) whether a magistrate who acted emotionally in detaining the defendant's representative and who had prior knowledge of the defendant's previous convictions should have disqualified himself from conducting the trial.

3.Having considered these points carefully, my decision is I decline to certify that they are points of law of great and general importance or that any point of law of great and general importance was involved in my decision in this appeal.

4.The applicant is advised that if he contends that substantial and grave injustice has been done, he should apply directly to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal and the application should be made by 23 April 2003.

(Peter Nguyen)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Mr Raymond Cheng, GC of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR

Mr Choy Bing Wing, representative of the Applicant, in person

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 18/2003