Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 23 May 1985.
1. On costs, Mr. Mullick for the appellant submitted that his client should have his costs of this appeal, as from the filing of the notice of appeal. The appellant he submitted had succeeded. He had to come to the Court. The assessment had been reduced, not by as much as he would have wished but by an appreciable amount. Any such reduction should carry costs.