Mayar (HK) Ltd v. Narotam Sayal

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2801/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 October 2003.

1. I have made an order to adjourn the hearing of assessment of damages today sine die not to be restored until after the hearing of the Defendant's Summons to set aside the default judgment, which has also been adjourned to give time to parties to file evidence. The Plaintiff then applies for costs of the hearing today, on the basis that the Defendant's application to set aside the default judgment was made late.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2801/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Oct 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA002801/2002

HCA 2801/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2801 OF 2002

_________________________

BETWEEN
MAYAR (H.K.) LTD Plaintiff
AND
NAROTAM SAYAL Defendant

_________________________

Coram: Master Kenneth Wong in Court

Date of Hearing: 15 October 2003

Date of Decision: 15 October 2003

Date of Handing Down Decision: 21 October 2003

________________________

REASON FOR DECISION

________________________

1.I have made an order to adjourn the hearing of assessment of damages today sine die not to be restored until after the hearing of the Defendant's Summons to set aside the default judgment, which has also been adjourned to give time to parties to file evidence. The Plaintiff then applies for costs of the hearing today, on the basis that the Defendant's application to set aside the default judgment was made late.

2.The Defendant's solicitors filed the Notice to Act on 7 October 2003 and took out the said application on 13 October 2003, together with two supporting affidavits with voluminous exhibits. I note the size of the documents and a number of jurisdictional and factual issues have been raised in the evidence filed. As such, I think the Defendant's solicitors cannot be blamed for having done so much work in those 6 days after they were appointed by the Defendant. Of course, that does not explain why the Defendant has come to his solicitor so late, being less than 2 weeks before the hearing today. I note that the Defendant has given some explanation in his affidavit. Hence the matter should be dealt with in the coming hearing after the Court has an opportunity to look at all the evidence filed by both parties.

3.For this reason, I reserve the costs of the hearing today, to be decided together with the costs of the Defendant's Summons to set aside default judgment filed on 13 October 2003.

(Kenneth Wong)
Temporary Deputy Registrar

Representation:

Mr. A. Cheng instructed by Messrs. Patrick Wong & Co. for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Taylor of Messrs. Tanner De Witt for the Defendant.

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2801/2002