HKSAR v. Law Ho

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1031/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 January 1999.

1. This is an appeal against sentence imposed upon the appellant at South Kowloon Magistrates Court on 30th September 1998. For an offence of possessing an offensive weapon in a public place contrary to Section 33(1) of Chapter 245 the appellant was sentenced to a term of 6 months imprisonment and for an offence of remaining in Hong Kong without authority he was sentenced to a term of 15 months imprisonment, those sentences to be served consecutively.

Case No.HCMA 1031/1998
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Jan 1999
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA001031/1998

HCMA 1031/98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1031 OF 1998

____________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
LAW HO Appellant

____________

Coram: Deputy Judge Jackson in Court

Date of Hearing: 5 January 1999

Date of Judgment: 5 January 1999

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. This is an appeal against sentence imposed upon the appellant at South Kowloon Magistrates Court on 30th September 1998. For an offence of possessing an offensive weapon in a public place contrary to Section 33(1) of Chapter 245 the appellant was sentenced to a term of 6 months imprisonment and for an offence of remaining in Hong Kong without authority he was sentenced to a term of 15 months imprisonment, those sentences to be served consecutively.

2. The appellant, who pleaded guilty to those offences in the Magistracy, had 4 previous convictions; two in 1995 for possessing an instrument fit for an unlawful purpose and for unlawful remaining, when he was sentenced to terms of 1 month and 14 months respectively; and two in 1997 for theft and unlawful remaining when he was sentenced to terms of imprisonment of 1 month and 14 months respectively.

3. The only grounds of appeal advanced by the appellant before me were that his present sentence was too severe and that his family needs his support.

4. There is nothing whatsoever in these grounds of appeal. The appellant might consider himself fortunate not be serving a much longer sentence than that imposed by the learned magistrate.

5. This appeal is dismissed.

(C. G. Jackson)
Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr Joseph To, SGC for DPP.

Mr Law Ho, Appellant in person.