The Queen v. Chan Chow Lung

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 393/1990 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 August 1990.

1. This is an appeal against the imposition by a magistrate, Mr. Davies, of 18 months' imprisonment on a charge of remaining in Hong Kong after having landed unlawfully. A second charge of using an identity card belonging to another person was not proceeded with.

Case No.HCMA 393/1990
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Aug 1990
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000393/1990

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 393/90

--------------------------------------------------------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

AND

CHAN Chow-lung

------------------------

Coram: Hon. Sir Derek Cons, Ag. C.J.

Date of Hearing: 15 August 1990

Date of Judgment: 15 August 1990

----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

Hon. Sir Derek Cons, Ag. C. J. :

1. This is an appeal against the imposition by a magistrate, Mr. Davies, of 18 months' imprisonment on a charge of remaining in Hong Kong after having landed unlawfully. A second charge of using an identity card belonging to another person was not proceeded with.

2. The defendant was arrested as he was in the street and produced a card which did not belong to him. In mitigation he explained to the magistrate that although he knew from having been here before that he was likely to be imprisoned should he come again, he was induced to do so because his wife ran off with another man to Hong Kong and left him with a child to look after there. He said that he had only been here two days before his arrest.

3. In the circumstances, the sentence imposed by the magistrate was quite correct. Since then, however, the defendant has received correspondence from China which indicates that his son has been sick and that a friend who looks after his son for him is having difficulties continuing to do so with his own three children.

4. Mr. Lee, for the Crown, quite correctly points out that this is a matter which could be taken into account by the Executive as it is something that has happened since the conviction, but it is not unusual for the Court of Appeal to take account of what has occurred between the time of the conviction and the appeal and I think it proper in these special circumstances to allow the appeal and reduce the sentence to 12 months.

(Sir Derek Cons)
Ag. Chief Justice

Representation:

Mr. Stanley Lee Crown Prosecutor for the Respondent Appellant in person.