Read the full judgment text of CACC 000261/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 April 2001.
1. The applicant was charged with one offence of falsely applying to goods a trade mark, contrary to section 9(1)(b) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362 ("the Ordinance") and two offences of applying a false trade description to goods, contrary to section 7(1)(a)(i) of the Ordinance.
Cites 1 case