Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 016608/2000 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 October 2003.
1. This is an application for substituted service of an examination order on the Defendant. Requisition has been raised and the Plaintiff tried to clarify the query by supplemental affirmation, and further applied for a prohibition order against the Defendant. Having considered all the evidence, I ordered substituted service of the examination order on the Defendant in terms hereinafter mentioned but ruled against the application for prohibition order. And this is my reason for coming to this a
Cited by 1 case