Read the full judgment text of CACC 265/1997 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 December 1997.
1. The applicant faced three charges - using a false instrument contrary to s.73 of the Crimes Ordinance ("the Ordinance"), possession of a false instrument contrary to s.75(1) of the Ordinance and possession of equipment for making a false instrument contrary to s.76(1) of the Ordinance. In the first, it was alleged that he, on 13th November 1996 at the Bank of East Asia, at 10 Des Voeux Road Central, together with Zhou Rui-xiong, used instruments namely, eight Certificates of Time Deposit of t
Cited by 1 case