Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000644/2000 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 28 February 2003.
1. The applicant is claiming employees' compensation against the 1st and 2nd respondents. The claim was initially brought against the 1st respondent as the employer with notice to its insurance company Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited ("Tai Ping"). By its Answer the 1st respondent denied it was the employer of the applicant but instead claimed the 2nd respondent or alternatively, the 2nd respondent's sub-contractor, to be the applicant's employer. Such a claim prompted an amendment of the Appl
Cites 1 case