Read the full judgment text of HCA 000604/1986 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 June 1989.
1. The plaintiffs apply by summons for leave to re-amend their re-amended Statement of Claim. The primary and material effect of the proposed amendments is to substitute the 9th defendant ("Gasoline") in lieu of the 2nd to the 5th plaintiffs ("the Marcianos"). The latter originally commenced this derivative action on behalf of Gasoline, which was not itself able to bring proceedings, its management being in the hands of the Nakashes and the board being evenly split between the Marcianos and the