The Queen v. Chan Wai Kwok

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 963/1990 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 April 1991.

1. The appellant was convicted on his own plea on charges of (a) tampering with a motor vehicle; (b) possession of an instrument fit for unlawful purpose; and (c) remaining in Hong Kong without authority.

Case No.HCMA 963/1990
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Apr 1991
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000963/1990

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIAINAL APPEAL NO.963 OF 1990

_________

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN Respondent
AND
CHAN WAI KWOK (D1) Appellant

______________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Barnes in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 April 1991

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 11 April 1991

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. The appellant was convicted on his own plea on charges of (a) tampering with a motor vehicle; (b) possession of an instrument fit for unlawful purpose; and (c) remaining in Hong Kong without authority.

2. He is 32 years of age with no previous convictions but he had made one previous attempt to come to Hong Kong unlawfully.

3. The learned magistrate sentenced him to imprisonment on the (a) charge to imprisonment for 2 months on the (b) charge to imprisonment for 1 month concurrent with the sentence on (a), and on (c) imprisonment for 15 months consecutive to (a) making a total of 17 months.

4. The appellant has appealed against the sentences but informs me that he has no complaint about either the individual sentences themselves or the totality of them. He merely wishes tone given credit for time spent in custody whilst the circumstances of his coming to Hong Kong were investigated by the immigration Department. He spent some 10 days in custody whilst this investigation was going on and of course that period is not taken into account when the Correctional Services Department calculates the time of his release.

5. In order to give him credit for that period that he spent in custody I propose to alter the sentence on the (c) charges to 14 1/2 months.

6. The appeal is allowed to that extent so that he will serve an effective period of 16 1/2 months.

(E.C. Barnes)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. S.R. Bailey S.C.C. f or Crown

Appellant: Chan Wai Kwok in person