The Queen v. Young Tat Soo
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1785/1990 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 March 1991.
1. This was a very bad piece of driving, indeed it as reckless driving, which caused the death of a young person.
|
HCMA001785/1990 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1785 of 1990 ___________ BETWEE
_______________ Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Sears in Court Date of Hearing: 12 March 1991 Date of Delivery of Judgment: 12 March 1991 ___________ JUDGMENT ___________ 1. This was a very bad piece of driving, indeed it as reckless driving, which caused the death of a young person. 2. The magistrate took into account the fact that as he was a professional driver that was an aggravating factor. It may be that is so, because people who drive public transport vehicles, whether it be taxis or buses, clearly owe a duty to drive properly and safeguard their passengers. 3. However, this man had shown, in my judgment, genuine remorse. He pleaded guilty and did not seek to excuse himself from this piece of bad driving, which appears although, of course, a very serious matter to be a 'one-off' type of case; there were no other aggravating factors other than the fact that he did not see the on-coming vehicles. Having regard to his age, his plea and also a fact which the magistrate did not take into account, namely that to deprive a person of driving for two years, is, for a professional driver a very serious punishment, I consider that the sentence can be suspended for a period of two years.
Representation: Mr. Saw, S.C.C. for the Crown Mr. Lawrence Lok instructed by M/s Howell & Co. for the Appellent. |