Read the full judgment text of CACC 000274/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Appellant in this case is said to be a watch repairer. It appears from the agreed facts that he was, to a certain extent, also a dealer in watches. He was at one time a seaman but had to give up that occupation due to an injury that he sustained. The watches in which he dealt were not genuine, in the sense that they appear to be cheap watches that had stamped upon them the registered marks of well-known and well-respected firms selling expensive watches. Unfortunately for the Appellant, s