Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 018931/2001 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 22 May 2003.
1. In this case, the Plaintiff claimed for the $240,000 being the balance of the purchase price of a set of second hand cigarettes production equipments sold and delivered and damages for conversion of one extra set of equipments mistakenly delivered to the Defendant. The Defendant alleged that pursuant to a supplemental agreement the balance of the purchase price was not payable until the equipments were demonstrated to be capable of achieving the efficient and passing rate as agreed between th