Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000619/2002 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 9 May 2003.
1. This all goes back, in my view, to the rather unusual wording that was employed by the respondents in admitting liability in this matter. They did so because, I have no doubt, they had in mind the potential involvement of the alleged tortfeasor to whom they would be looking to to get back any compensation that they were to pay to the applicant under the provisions in the relevant sections of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance.