Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000662/1989 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 August 1989.
1. The appellant was charged, together with a number of other, of gambling in a gambling establishment, contrary to section 6 of the Gambling Ordinance (Charge A) and he was further charged with being a person in charge of premises knowingly permitting the same to be used as a gambling establishment, contrary to section 15(1)(a) of the Ordinance (Charge C).