HKSAR v. Marietta Aglibut

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1026/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 December 2003.

1. The Appellant was convicted on her own plea of using an Identity Card Relating to Another Person, contrary to section 7A(1A) of the Registration of Persons Ordinance, Cap. 177 and Breach of Condition of Stay, contrary to section 41 of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment on the first count and 2 months on the second; the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

Case No.HCMA 1026/2003
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Dec 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA001026/2003

HCMA 1026/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1026 OF 2003

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 2863/2003)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
MARIETTA AGLIBUT Appellant

____________

Coram: Hon Beeson J in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 December 2003

Date of Judgment: 17 December 2003

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.The Appellant was convicted on her own plea of using an Identity Card Relating to Another Person, contrary to section 7A(1A) of the Registration of Persons Ordinance, Cap. 177 and Breach of Condition of Stay, contrary to section 41 of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment on the first count and 2 months on the second; the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2.The facts were that on 7 September 2003 the Appellant was stopped and asked to produce proof of identity. She produced an identity card in the name of another woman, which had been lost by the rightful holder in May 2003. The Appellant's passport showed she had overstayed almost 2 years since 23 October 2001, having been permitted to stay in Hong Kong from 23 October 1999 as a domestic helper.

3.In sentencing, the Magistrate took into account the Appellant's plea of guilty and the fact that she has 5 children to support.

4.In his Reasons for Sentence, he considered the sentencing cases relevant to these offences, in particular Chan Man-mo MA1059/99. He did not add an additional 2 months to the sentence on the first count as he might have done because the identity card had been shown to the police.

5.These sentences were neither excessive nor wrong in principle. The Magistrate took into account all the necessary factors in sentencing. The appeal is dismissed.

(C-M Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr P K Madigan, SGC, of Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Marietta Aglibut, Appellant, in person