Read the full judgment text of HCMP 003754/1990 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 December 1991.
2. The 1st respondent responded to the invitation within the time limit prescribed. There was a meeting in the Attorney General's Chambers when Mr Rose, a partner in the solicitors representing the respondents, produced leading counsel's opinion from which it was evident that the respondents did not accept the correctness of the view taken of the articles by the applicant. Mr Rose also wrote a letter to the applicant which summarised the conclusions reached by counsel and made it abundantly clea