Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000006/1983 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. There were two Respondents to this application by the Attorney General for review of sentence. They were separately charged and separately tried on charges, under s.7A(1) of the Registration of Persons Ordinance of possession of forged identity cards. The magistrate had prepared one statement of his Reasons for Sentence in respect of both cases, although we do not know at what stage of the proceedings this statement was prepared. Strictly, we think, there should have been two applications for