蔣書濤 訴 麗城花園第二期業主立案法團

Read the full judgment text of LDBM 15/2002 on BabelCite. This Lands Tribunal judgment.

1. 申請人是荃灣麗城花園第二期第七座24樓F室的業主;答辯人是麗城花園第二期的業主立案法團。

Cites 1 case

Case No.LDBM 15/2002
Court
Lands Tribunal
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

LDBM000015/2002

LDBM 15 OF 2002

香港特別行政區

土地審裁處

建築物管理申請編號2002年第15號

_______________________

蔣書濤 申請人
麗城花園第二期業主立案法團 答辯人

_______________________

主審法官:周兆熊法官

宣判日期:2002年3月28日

______________

判 案 書

______________

1.申請人是荃灣麗城花園第二期第七座24樓F室的業主;答辯人是麗城花園第二期的業主立案法團。

2.申請人的申請,是要求土地審裁處(“審裁處”)對以下之事作出裁決 :

"According to Chapter 344 Schedule 2 Section 5(1) all committee members should retire from office so the management committee should not exist or still hold office after the annual general meeting dated 12 Dec 2001"

3.答辯人則指法團的第三屆管理委員會仍是在職的管理委員會。

4.背景事實

2001年11月26日,答辯人的第三屆管理委員會發出召開 2001年業主周年大會的通告,通告指明業主周年大會將於2001年 12月12日舉行;該大會的議程包括“議決通過選舉第四屆管理委員會委員”以及“議決通過選出第四屆管理委員會主席、副主席、秘書及司庫”。

4.1該業主周年大會如期舉行,但在2001年12月13日0230時,當第四屆管理委員會委員的選舉結果即將公佈時,有部份業主離場,致使大會未能保持足夠的法定人數,因而不能繼續它的議程。

4.2第三屆管理委員會並無在業主周年大會中退職,因為明顯的事實是在它可以在適當的時間退職之前,業主大會已因法定人數不足而流會。本席要裁決之事就是是否仍然在職的管理委員會;與此有關的法例是《建築物管理條例》(“條例”)附表2第5(1)段。該段有以下的條文 :

“5. (1) 在法團按照附表3第1(1)(b)段召開的第二次業主周年大會及其後每隔一次的業主周年大會上,管理委員會的所有委員均須退職,但以租客代表身分而根據第2(2)段當作為獲委任的委員(如有的話)除 外。”

4.3第5(1)段祇是規定管理委員會必須退職。它並無提及違反這規定的後果。如果立法當局認為違反第5(1)段的規定會令致管理委員會退職,它應該明文立法作出此規定。如果管理委員會因違反第5(1)段的 規定而被視作為已退去其職,則大廈的管理會立即產生管理上的真 空,因為在新的管理委員會在獲得出席法團會議的業主委任之前,該業主大會可能自然的因素引致不能繼續進行,例如火警、颱風、暴兩警告等。另外的因素是在會議途中因各種原因引致法定人數不足要中止會 議。本案就是屬於後者。管理上的真空往往產生不良的後果。這決不會是立法者通過第5(1)段的原意。

4.4條例的有關條文清楚顯示條例的一個重要目的,是要使大廈的管理不會出現真空的狀態,而大廈的管理是有賴於業主立案法團的管 理委員會的存在。條例第30條規定出席根據附表3第1段召開法團會議的業主,可委任一名管理人,然後議決解散管理委員會。第31條授權審裁處可作出解散管理委員會並委任一名管理人的權力,而第32條指明管理人須有管理委員會及其主席、秘書及司庫的全部權力及職 責。第30條及31條清楚顯示條例的目的,是在於避免法團的管理委 員會出現真空的狀態。

4.5上訴法庭在The Incorporated Owners of Finance Building v. Bright Hill Management Consultants Company Limited (CACV 386/2000)一案所表達的多數意見是適用於本案的案情。在該案,有關的管理委員 會並無遵照條例附表3第1(1)(a)段的規定召開第一屆業主周年大會。上訴法庭的胡法官在判詞中說 :

".....the first annual general meeting should, according to this provision, have been convened by 7 January 1998. ............ However, what is the effect of the Management Committee failing to convene such a meeting by 7 January 1998? .........

34. There is no express provision in the Ordinance that in the event of such a failure, the management committee will automatically dissolve or cease to have the power to represent the corporation. Also absent is any express provision that the members of the management committee will cease to hold office after the deadline. The provisions of the Ordinance which, I thick, are most relevant are set out below.

The long title: To facilitate the incorporation of owners of flats in buildings or groups of buildings, to provide for the management of buildings or groups of buildings and for matters incidental thereto or connected therewith.

s.6: The Second Schedule shall have effect with respect to the composition and procedure of a management committee.

s. 8(2)(a): With effect from the date of issue of the certificate of registration under subsection (1) -

(a) the owners for the time being shall be a body corporate with perpetual succession and shall in the name of the corporation specified in the certificate of registration be capable of suing and being sued and, subject to this Ordinance, of doing and suffering all such other acts and things as bodies corporate may lawfully do and suffer;

s.8(5): The Third Schedule shall have effect with respect to the meetings and procedure of a corporation.

s. 18 provides for the duties and powers of a corporation.

s. 16: When the owners of a building have been incorporated under section 8, the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the owners in relation to the common parts of the building shall be exercised and performed by, and the liabilities of the owners in relation to the common parts of the building shall, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, be enforceable against, the corporation to the exclusion of the owners, ...

s.29: Subject to this Ordinance, the powers and duties conferred or imposed by this Ordinance on a corporation shall be exercised and performed on behalf of the corporation by the management committee.

Second Schedule, para 3: ... the members of the management committee appointed at a meeting convened ... shall hold office until a new management committee is appointed and assumes office at the second general meeting of the corporation.

Second Schedule, para 5(1): At the second annual general meeting of a corporation convened in accordance with paragraph 1(1)(b) of the Third Scheduel and thereafter at every alternative general meeting, all members of the management committee, ..., shall retire from office.

Third Schedule, para 1(1): The management committee shall convene-

(a) the first annual general meeting of a corporation not later than 15 months after the date of the registration of the corporation;

(b) an annual general meeting not earlier than 12 months, and not later than 15 months, after the date of the first or previous general meeting;

(c) a general meeting of the corporation at any time for such purposes as the management committee thinks fit.

Third Schedule, para 1(2): The chairman of the management committee shall convene a general meeting of the corporation at the request of not less than 5% of the owners for the purposes specified by such owners within 14 days of receiving such request.

(emphasis added)

35. It is important to not that the Ordinance expressly gives power to the owners to request the chairman of the management committee to convene a general meeting (para 1(2) of the Third Schedule). It would be impossible to give effect to that provision in the event that the owners request the chairman to convene a meeting after the management committee has failed to comply with para 1(1)(a) or (b) of the Third Schedule by the respective deadlines provided therein if the failure had the effect of having already made the office of all the members of the management committee, which necessarily include the chairman (para 2(1)(b) of the Second Schedule), to lapse. Para 3 of the Second Schedule expressly allows members of the management committee to hold office until a new management committee is appointed. An interpretation of paras 3 and 5(1) of the Second Schedule, combined with para 1(1) of the Third Schedule, that the management committee has ceased to exist or function 15 months after the date of the registration of the corporation or after the date of the previous annual general meeting would also give rise to a vacuum in the management of the building, as there would be no one or no body to exercise the powers and perform the duties set out in s 18 on behalf of the corporation under s 29 in the various aspects of management, such as collecting monthly management and maintenance charges, contracting with or instructing any contractors or workers to carry out necessary repair and maintenance works to the common parts after the deadline. I am therefore compelled to come to the view that that cannot be the proper interpretation of these provisions of the Ordinance.

36. The interpretation that the Management Committee would dissolve or cease to exist or be rendered powerless appears to violate the clearly expressed intent of the Ordinance as described in its long title and the provisions of para 3 of the Second Schedule. .......................

...................................

40. In the result, albeit without hesitation, I would prefer the interpretation of the provisions of the Ordinance in this respect that when a management committee fails to convene the first annual general meeting, and for that matter, any subsequent annual general meeting, the management committee will continue to operate and its members will continue to hold office until the next annual general meeting is held. When the second general meeting is held, then the members of the management committee shall retire from office in accordance with para 5(1) of the Second Schedule."

5.第三屆管理委員會既然在業主週年大會上並無退職 ,本席裁決它仍是在職的管理委員會。

6.基於上述的理由,本席撤銷申請人的申請。

周兆熊法官
土地審裁處

申請人:親自應訊。(無律師代表)

答辯人:由吳翠霞女士代表。(無律師代表)