Lee Chung-yim v. The Queen
Read the full judgment text of CACC 293/1979 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 April 1979.
2. The appellant is a professional driver and has been so for fifteen years. He has three previous similar convictions, one in 1976 and two in 1977. On each occasion he was fined and it is obvious from the size of the fines that the cases were not very serious. That remark also applies to the present case.
|
CACC000293/1979
Coram: Briggs, C.J. Date of Judgment: 17 April 1979 ----------------- JUDGMENT ----------------- The appellant pleaded guilty to an offence of careless driving and was sentenced to a fine of $1 and disqualified from driving all vehicles for three months. That was on the 23rd February, 1979. He appeals against the order for disqualification. 2. The appellant is a professional driver and has been so for fifteen years. He has three previous similar convictions, one in 1976 and two in 1977. On each occasion he was fined and it is obvious from the size of the fines that the cases were not very serious. That remark also applies to the present case. 3. What happened was that the appellant switched lanes causing another vehicle to brake. There was no collision, no property was damaged and nobody was injured. It would seem that the magistrate, in passing the sentence he did on the appellant, was influenced by the fact that the appellant, when he appeared before him, walked with the aid of a stick. The appellant suffers from rheumatism from time to time and I was told that when he so suffers he cannot drive. 4. In my view, the sentence of disqualification in this case is not justified. It was a trivial case and the appellant pleaded guilty and a fine would have been enough. In the event, therefore, the appeal is allowed to the extent that the order for disqualification is quashed.
|