Read the full judgment text of HCA 008997/1982 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. My ruling is required upon an application made by Mr. Chan for the plaintiff to put before me an affirmation by a Mr. S.S. Sachdeva of Commercial Street, London although the application is, in fact, to have the affirmation admitted as a statement under Order 38 rule 21. Originally, when notice was served upon the defendant, it was said that the affirmation was to go in pursuant to Order 38 rule 2, but that was in error. The defendant served a counter notice under Order 38 rule 2, also in erro