Read the full judgment text of HCA 001029/1989 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant could not be simpler. The plaintiff sues on five cheques dishonoured in the sense that the cheques were countermanded. The defence version is that these five cheques had been replaced by eleven. It is the defendant's allegation that the goods for which the five cheques were issued were defective in size and fungal growth and that the defendant was willing to forbear to sue on the defects in return for an agreement from the plaintiff to re-ad