HKSAR v. Siu Chung Fai

Read the full judgment text of CACC 301/1997 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 November 1997.

1. In this matter Hawkes D.J. on 5th June 1995 sentenced the applicant on two charges of robbery and one of theft. The sentences were four years on each of the robbery charges and two years on the theft charge and the sentences were ordered to be concurrent. He also ordered that the sentences were to commence from today. The applicant was at that time serving a sentence of imprisonment of 15 months that had been imposed upon him on another robbery charge by a magistrate in Tsuen Wan on 25th May

Case No.CACC 301/1997
Court
Court of Appeal
Date18 Nov 1997
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000301/1997

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1997, No.301
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
HKSAR
AND
SIU Chung-fai

-------------------------------

Coram: Hon. Power, V.-P., Mayo, J.A. & Pang, J.

Date of Hearing: 18 November 1997

Date of Judgment: 18 November 1997

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Power, V.-P. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. In this matter Hawkes D.J. on 5th June 1995 sentenced the applicant on two charges of robbery and one of theft. The sentences were four years on each of the robbery charges and two years on the theft charge and the sentences were ordered to be concurrent. He also ordered that the sentences were to commence from today. The applicant was at that time serving a sentence of imprisonment of 15 months that had been imposed upon him on another robbery charge by a magistrate in Tsuen Wan on 25th May 1995. Clearly the order of Judge Hawkes made the sentences which he was then imposing concurrent with the remainder of the 15 months that the applicant still had to serve on the earlier robbery charge. Confusion seems to have arisen because of a memorandum from the judge's clerk on 22nd June 1995 which wrongly stated that the sentences imposed by Judge Hawkes were to run consecutively to the existing sentences. This was incorrect. This matter should not have been made the subject of an appeal and it would not be appropriate for us to adjudicate upon it as such. We indicate simply that the sentences are to be computed as we have set out above and ask the Commission for Correctional Services to note what we have said.

(N.P. Power) (Simon Mayo) (K.K. Pang)
Vice-President Justice of Appeal Judge of the Court of First Instance of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Derek Pang (D.P.P.) for the Respondent.

Mr. A.C. Macrae assigned by D.L.A. for the Applicant.