Read the full judgment text of CACC 000302/1999 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 March 2000.
1. The applicants together with eight other people were charged with a number of offences in relation to what can best be described as an immigration scam. The 1st applicant was D5 and the 2nd applicant was D6. It is convenient to refer to them in a similar manner to the way in which they were referred to in the District Court. At the time of the offences they were charged with D5 and D6 were engaged to be married and at the time of their trial they were married. D5 was a serving police officer
Cited by 1 case