Lee Fuk Hing v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 10/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 1 April 2004.
1. We are persuaded on the basis of the first ground, and also on basis of the second ground inasmuch as it is tied in with the first one, that the applicant has a reasonably arguable case of substantial and grave injustice. So we grant him leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on that limb. Having done so, we do not preclude him from advancing the third ground, too, before the Court, if he is so advised.
|
FAMC No. 10 of 2004 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 10 OF 2004 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 376 OF 2000) _____________________ Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 1 April 2004 Date of Determination: 1 April 2004 __________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N __________________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1. We are persuaded on the basis of the first ground, and also on basis of the second ground inasmuch as it is tied in with the first one, that the applicant has a reasonably arguable case of substantial and grave injustice. So we grant him leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on that limb. Having done so, we do not preclude him from advancing the third ground, too, before the Court, if he is so advised.
Mr Robert Pang and Miss Pauline Leung (assigned by the Hong Kong Bar Association’s Free Legal Service Scheme) for the applicant Mr David Leung (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent |