Read the full judgment text of HCA 005399/1994 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. In this Action, the Plaintiff claimed against the Defendant for some $530,000 as price for goods sold and delivered but unpaid. The debt was admitted by the Defendant in the pleading and the only issue at the Trial is whether the above debt was discharged by reason of an alleged oral settlement agreement made between Mr. Wan ("Wan") of the Plaintiff and Mr. Hani Khemlani ("Hani"), a partner of the Defendant firm (hereinafter referred to as "Kay Kay"). Kay Kay contends that a binding agreement