Read the full judgment text of CACC 000315/1985 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 December 1985.
1. The applicant was originally indicted for 30 counts of offences under the Theft Ordinance. At the end of the prosecution case the learned trial judge held that the applicant had no case to answer in respect of 20 counts leaving 10 for the consideration of the jury. In the event the jury convicted the applicant of 4 counts of furnishing false information for accounting purposes contrary to section 19(1)(b) of the Theft Ordinance. The counts were 2, 5, 8 and 11 respectively.