Tse Jeekeen v. H.K. Alliance in Support of Patriotic Movement of China and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 13938/1997 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 April 1998.

1. The Defendants succeeded in striking out the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim before the Master. The Plaintiff now appeals against that decision.

Case No.HCA 13938/1997
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Apr 1998
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA013938/1997

1997, No.A13938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

---------------------

BETWEEN
TSE JEEKEEN Plaintiff/
Appellant
AND
"H.K. ALLIANCE IN SUPPORT OF PATRIOTIC MOVEMENT OF CHINA" & ITS CHAIRMAN MR SZETO WAH

"H.K. DEMOCRATIC PARTY" & ITS CHAIRMAN
MR LEE CHUI MING (MARTIN)

MR CHEUNG MAN KONG, PRESIDENT OF
"THE HONG KONG PROFESSIONAL TEACHER'S UNION"

"APRIL 5 ACTION" & ITS LEADER
MR LEUNG KWOK HUNG

Defendants/
Respondents

--------------------

Coram : Hon Mr Justice Cheung in Chambers

Date of hearing : 22 April 1998

Date of delivery of judgment : 22 April 1998

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. The Defendants succeeded in striking out the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim before the Master. The Plaintiff now appeals against that decision.

2. In the Statement of Claim, it is pleaded that "The Plaintiff hereby charges the Defendants slandering the Central Government and its leaders inciting the public against the Central Government and it leaders' attempt (including advocacy) to overflow the Central Government and treasonable links to foreign powers. The relief sought by the Plaintiff is that :

(1) he asked the Court to annul the business or organisational registration of the 1st and 4th Defendants;

(2) he asked the Court to order the Defendants to make a public apology to the Central Government; and

(3) payment of punitive compensation to the Plaintiff.

3. The action is obviously misconceived. Even if, for the purpose of an striking out application, the allegations contained in the Statement of Claim are treated as true, the proper person to lodge the complaint is not the Plaintiff. He has failed to show that he has the standing to bring these proceedings.

4. The remedies he asked for are likewise not available to him. The Statement of Claim discloses no reasonable cause of action and the Master is correct in striking out the Statement of Claim. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs to the Defendants.

(P Cheung)

Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court.

Representation:

Tse Jeekeen, in person

Mr Albert C. Y. Ho, of M/s Ho, Tse, Wai & Partners, for the Defendants