Tse Jeekeen v. H.K. Alliance in Support of Patriotic Movement of China and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 13938/1997 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 April 1998.
1. The Defendants succeeded in striking out the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim before the Master. The Plaintiff now appeals against that decision.
|
HCA013938/1997 1997, No.A13938 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ---------------------
-------------------- Coram : Hon Mr Justice Cheung in Chambers Date of hearing : 22 April 1998 Date of delivery of judgment : 22 April 1998 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- 1. The Defendants succeeded in striking out the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim before the Master. The Plaintiff now appeals against that decision. 2. In the Statement of Claim, it is pleaded that "The Plaintiff hereby charges the Defendants slandering the Central Government and its leaders inciting the public against the Central Government and it leaders' attempt (including advocacy) to overflow the Central Government and treasonable links to foreign powers. The relief sought by the Plaintiff is that :
3. The action is obviously misconceived. Even if, for the purpose of an striking out application, the allegations contained in the Statement of Claim are treated as true, the proper person to lodge the complaint is not the Plaintiff. He has failed to show that he has the standing to bring these proceedings. 4. The remedies he asked for are likewise not available to him. The Statement of Claim discloses no reasonable cause of action and the Master is correct in striking out the Statement of Claim. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs to the Defendants.
Representation: Tse Jeekeen, in person Mr Albert C. Y. Ho, of M/s Ho, Tse, Wai & Partners, for the Defendants |