Read the full judgment text of HCCT000025/1996 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 5 June 1998 before The Hon Mr Justice Findlay.
Procedure — Interim payment — Order 29, rule 10 application — Subcontract payments dispute — Verification of debt and documentary evidence — Disputes over debit notes, interest, and liquidated damages — Assessment of amounts payable as interim payments — Court satisfied plaintiffs entitled to substantial sums despite disputes — Defendant ordered to pay first and second plaintiffs specified interim sums immediately — Costs issues reserved for further argument.
Legal issues: Interim payment by defendant to plaintiffs
Outcome: Interim payments ordered to first and second plaintiffs from defendant