Read the full judgment text of HCA 008805/1993 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 January 1994.
1. The Plaintiff's claim against the 1st Defendant is for a variety of injunctions, principally mandatory in nature, and for damages for trespass and/or breach of agreement. Its claim against the 2nd Defendant is also for injunctive relief, principally mandatory in nature, and for damages for trespass. The Plaintiff has applied by summons in the action for the injunctive relief. There is really no dispute that, if that relief is granted, it will have the effect of deciding the action between the