Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000022/1984 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The Crown appeals, by way of case stated, from, the decision of a magistrate, at the conclusion of the prosecution evidence, that the respondent had no case to answer. The respondent, a detective sergeant, was charged, under section 3 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance with accepting an advantage, namely a loan of $50,000.00. The first question of law to which an answer is sought, is :-