Read the full judgment text of HCMP 2940/1992 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 June 1992.
1. This is a dispute between vendor and purchaser, which blew up because the purchaser required proof of due execution of one of the documents of title tendered by the vendor. By way of proof of due execution, the vendor offered the purchaser secondary evidence of due execution, in the form of a statutory declaration, and insisted that the purchaser was entitled to no more. The purchaser, for its part, insisted that, if completion was to take place, the vendor must undertake to use its best ende
Cited by 1 case