Read the full judgment text of HCA 005847/1996 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 July 1997.
2. The Plaintiff's merchandiser gave evidence that the Plaintiff entered into contract for supply of garments under six contracts and paid a deposit of 100,000. The Defendant had previous dealings with the Plaintiff and in view of that relation and quantity of garments ordered knew that the garments were intended for resale. The Defendant failed to supply the garments. The Plaintiff in turn was unable to supply the garment to fulfil a sub-sale to Emperor Industries Inc. of Los Angeles. Had the P