Read the full judgment text of HCA 007502/1991 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The plaintiffs in this action are disappointed sub-purchasers. Their claim in this action has now resolved itself into a claim for damages for loss of their bargain. They blame for this loss the 1st defendant, the original purchaser; or, alternatively, the 2nd defendant, the solicitor who acted for them about the transaction. So far as the original vendor is concerned, neither the plaintiffs, nor the 1st defendant, have brought him into this action, so I am not in a position to decide, advers