R. v. Kong Po Hong
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 229/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 June 1995.
1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant pleaded guilty before Mr Wright at the Eastern Magistracy on two charges: one of burglary; the other of common assault.
|
HCMA000229/1995 IN THE HIGH COURT 1995, No. 229 __________
__________ Coram: Hon Litton, V.-P. sitting as an additional High Court Judge Date of hearing: 9 June 1995 Date of judgment: 9 June 1995 ________________ J U D G M E N T ________________ Litton, V.-P.: 1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant pleaded guilty before Mr Wright at the Eastern Magistracy on two charges: one of burglary; the other of common assault. 2. The crimes occurred on the same day and same occasion, 20 December 1993, when the appellant entered the premises of Chung Luen Forwarding Agencies on the 1/F, Hop Wai Building in North Point and robbed the inmates of those premises of a portable telephone, some coins and cash of $1200 belonging to a person present there. He also assaulted that person and that constituted the second charge. 3. The magistrate dealt with the underlying facts with care. The appellant has a criminal record, having been convicted of theft in 1980 and assault occasioning actual bodily harm in 1993. He was divorced at the time and paid a substantial proportion of his monthly income to his former wife as maintenance for her and for their child. The appellant also contributed to the support of his parents. 4. The magistrate took into account every relevant circumstance and sentenced the appellant on the burglary charge to 18 months' imprisonment and on the common assault charge to three months' imprisonment consecutive to the first charge making a total of 21 months. The sentences are neither excessive nor wrong in principle and the appeal is dismissed. Representation: Mr Wesley W.C. Wong (Crown Prosecutor) for Respondent/Crown Appellant in person
|