The Queen v. Wong Chun

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1135/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 February 1996.

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of nine months imposed for possession of a false identity card and remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. This was another case involving a pregnant lady who had since given birth to the child, which had been in custody with the appellant until the present time. I need not repeat the opinion I expressed about these matter in an appeal I heard just the other day, R. v. Lam Kuen Hung , MA1027 of 1995. Suffice it for me

Case No.HCMA 1135/1995
Court
High Court CFI
Date07 Feb 1996
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA001135/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.1135 OF1995

--------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN Respondent
AND
WONG CHUN Appellant

--------------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 1 February 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 7 February 1996

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of nine months imposed for possession of a false identity card and remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. This was another case involving a pregnant lady who had since given birth to the child, which had been in custody with the appellant until the present time. I need not repeat the opinion I expressed about these matter in an appeal I heard just the other day, R. v. Lam Kuen Hung, MA1027 of 1995. Suffice it for me to say that on humanitarian grounds I thought it right to allow this appeal, and to reduce the sentence so that this lady could be released immediately.

Representation:

Mr F. Veltro, S.C.C., for Crown

Appellant (Wong Chun) in person

- 2 -

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court