Read the full judgment text of HCA 009087/1993 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The 1st Plaintiff was tenant of a flat at 388 Shanghai Street, 5th Floor. The 2nd Plaintiff is the 1st Plaintiff's husband. He occupied the flat with her. The 1st Defendant is the landlord. The 2nd Defendant is nowallegedly the tenant and occupier of the flat. The Plaintiffs' claim against the 1st Defendant is for a declaration that the 1st Plaintiff is still the lawful tenantof the flat and for damages for trespass and conversion. Against the 1st and 2nd Defendants, the Plaintiffs claim a de