R. v. Lee Siu Keung, Edmond

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 115/1997 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 May 1997.

1. Driving cases are normally issues of fact for the magistrate to decide. There are, however, a number of points which the appellant has very properly raised.

Case No.HCMA 115/1997
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 May 1997
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000115/1997

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL No.115 OF 1997

____________________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN Respondent
AND
LEE SIU KEUNG, EDMOND Appellant

____________________

Coram: Hon Sears, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 15 May 1997

Date of judgment: 15 May 1997

____________________

J U D G M E N T

____________________

1. Driving cases are normally issues of fact for the magistrate to decide. There are, however, a number of points which the appellant has very properly raised.

2. But from the notes of verdict, the magistrate made a site visit not in the presence of the appellant, nor indeed the prosecution. This is a material irregularity - magistrates are not permitted to acquire evidence which is not open to challenge by a defendant.

3. The Crown does not oppose this appeal which is therefore allowed.

(R.A.W. Sears)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Joseph To, S.C.C., for Crown/Respondent

Appellant: in person