Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001049/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 January 2000.
1. The appellant was charged with a total of four offences relating to her illegal stay in Hong Kong. The 1st charge was using an unlawfully obtained travel document for the purpose of Part II of the Immigration Ordinance, contrary to s.42(2)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap.115, Laws of Hong Kong. The 2nd charge was making a false representation to an immigration assistant lawfully acting under or in the execution of Part II of the Immigration Ordinance, contrary to s.42(1)(a) of the Immigr