Chung Kin Kiu Andy v. Business & Industrial Trade Fairs Ltd.

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1283/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 March 2001.

1. The only dispute in this case is that of costs. Nothing that Mr Tsang has said this morning leads me to the conclusion that the general rule should not be followed, the general rule being that costs should follow the event.

Case No.HCMP 1283/2001
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Mar 2001
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP001283/2001

HCMP 1283/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1283 OF 2001

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE (CAP. 32)

and

IN THE MATTER OF

CHUNG KIN KIU ANDY Applicant
AND
BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL TRADE FAIRS LIMITED Respondent

____________

Coram: Hon Yuen J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 29 March 2001

Date of Decision: 29 March 2001

_______________

D E C I S I O N

_______________

1. The only dispute in this case is that of costs. Nothing that Mr Tsang has said this morning leads me to the conclusion that the general rule should not be followed, the general rule being that costs should follow the event.

2. I take the view that the Applicant was certainly entitled to issue the Originating Summons given that he had not been provided with the statutory documents for the years 1996 through to 2000, notwithstanding the fact that he had been asking for them since September of 1999.

3. Accordingly, I would order that the Respondent do pay the costs of the application to be taxed if not agreed.

(MARIA YUEN)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Mr Kenneth Shum, instructed by Dominic Y K Lai & Co., for the Applicant

Mr Joseph Tsang, of Tsangs, for the Respondent