Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 013999/2000 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 19 April 2001.
2. It is immediately apparent from photographs that the Defendant's space cannot accommodate the full length of the Defendant's car so that when the Defendant's car was parked at the Defendant's space one end of the Defendant's car would block vehicular access to or exit from the Plaintiffs' space. Thus it would seem an open and shut case against the Defendants. In fact, the Plaintiffs prayed in aid various clauses in the Deed of Mutual Covenant applicable to the parking area.